Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 27.06.2025 00:50

Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
What’s next?
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Consectetur assumenda in molestiae debitis accusamus quaerat consectetur.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Kelsey Parker announces loss of newborn baby Phoenix - BBC
Thank you.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Aut explicabo sapiente quis consequuntur fuga consectetur fugit.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
How do you envision the role of AI in software development evolving in the future?
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Devin Harjes, "Boardwalk Empire" and "Manifest" actor, dies at 41 - CBS News
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Russia can stop this any time.
Why are so many young teenage boys misogynistic? Where do they get these attitudes from?
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.